Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by bostonmd on December 06, 2014, 12:49:43 PM »
Question:  Why have all the new and recent posts have gone back to your Blog, Radio?  It is easier to read here.  NO? :offtopic:
12
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by Radio on December 05, 2014, 06:59:59 PM »
I see a document entitled "Exhibits to the Reply to Response for Motion for Summary Judgement?"   Is there an Order in there somewhere and I'm missing it?

Thanks!

I'm sorry, I don't know. This is what I was sent. Things may have changed, more may have been added. Maybe someone more in the know can clear this up.

Big win for Tricia!!
D Reply to Response to MSJ (OMEGA) dec 4 2014 FS.PDF
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B903GPyPwmk5TTFrb1RaYlVMeTg/view?usp=sharing

Exhibits:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B903GPyPwmk5MG9sQ19wTFNsaVU/view?usp=sharing
13
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by MtnMom on December 05, 2014, 06:48:49 PM »
I see a document entitled "Exhibits to the Reply to Response for Motion for Summary Judgement?"   Is there an Order in there somewhere and I'm missing it?

Thanks!   
15
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by Inspector Housewife on December 05, 2014, 09:31:26 AM »
Ha! Exactly! We love you until you piss us off! I really thought I was above that thinking. Truth be told, I have disagreed with Radio on her blog on many things for many years.  But, she/he has always been fair and been cordial.  Always allowed me to have a say.  I'm sure she can match my ISP to several different alts over the years. We've disagreed more than agreed ill just put it like that.  But never once did I feel chastised or belittled. Why is that such a hard thing to grasp at WS?
16
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by koldkase on December 05, 2014, 02:57:59 AM »
OOps, double post.  :shithappens:
17
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by koldkase on December 05, 2014, 02:56:33 AM »
Ok, well it's safe to say that I am completely done with Websleuths. It has absolutely no more redeeming quality about it.  I naively thought that perhaps it could survive with dignity. . . But it's hopeless. After years of blaming big bad Salem on crappy moderating, I get crappy moderating from Tricia herself!!

So. Done. Finito. Everyone and everything at WS is all the same. And I'm so tired of wasting time.  I have hopes this forum might take up the slack and provide a place where people of similar intellect can truly discuss the merits of a case.  Please make it happen!

I can see you're chagrined, and I feel your pain. I've had disagreements with Tricia and WS myself, but as has been said, nobody agrees with anyone all the time, so I said my piece and let it go.

I like this forum, as well. Thanks, Radio, for your hospitality. We loves you  :group hug: until you piss us off....  :spank2:
18
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by Inspector Housewife on December 04, 2014, 11:17:21 PM »
Ok, well it's safe to say that I am completely done with Websleuths. It has absolutely no more redeeming quality about it.  I naively thought that perhaps it could survive with dignity. . . But it's hopeless. After years of blaming big bad Salem on crappy moderating, I get crappy moderating from Tricia herself!!

So. Done. Finito. Everyone and everything at WS is all the same. And I'm so tired of wasting time.  I have hopes this forum might take up the slack and provide a place where people of similar intellect can truly discuss the merits of a case.  Please make it happen!
19
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by Pinecone on December 03, 2014, 04:48:05 PM »
As I have read it, the contract's Rules and Regulations are clear on which date matters, April 25, 2011, or May 1, 2011. 

From the Rules and Regulations:

"The Members have formed the Limited Liability Company by filing Articles of Organization (the "Articles") with the Secretary of State.... These Regulations are subject to and governed by the Texas Limited Liability Company Act and the Articles. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of these Regulations and the mandatory provisions of the Act or the provisions of the Articles, the provisions of the Act or the Articles control."

Don't know if the emails constitute any part of the Regulations or whether those emails would be considered "mandatory provisions of the Act or provisions of the articles."  The language in the signed agreement does specify that the agreement supersedes all previous agreements.  Wouldn't that mean the emails written the month before would also be superseded?  Suppose the judge will have to decide.

As far as which owner was active or not active that's probably something the judge wouldn't care about, there's nothing in the written agreement that specifies how active a co-owner has to be with the website.

The money TG got directly from people sent to her and not to the LLC is on them.  I think they're foolish and gullible but as they say, "A fool and his money are soon parted."  The money sent to WS LLC and intended for the purchase of Adfree pages or other goods or services, and transferred into TG's private accounts, could be an issue and especially so if those emails are determined to be superseded by the signed agreement in May 2011.
20
Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion / Re: Websleuths Lawsuit Discussion
« Last post by Moniker on December 03, 2014, 04:43:14 PM »
I was just reading some of the latest pages posted to the locked lawsuit thread on Websleuths(why are they making multiple threads about this btw?) and read the interview with Kimster...

Ignoring lots of other issues, I don't understand the hate directed towards Tricia's radio show(s). I've listened to many different true crime radio shows and Tricia's always seemed much more professional than most, no yelling over guests, generally very respectful and so on. I also don't understand the hate about Tricia advertising the shows on the board. They are on topic, they are about cases being discussed on Websleuths, they are relevant. The last part I wrote was in response to some comments of sue about her not being comfortable with Tricia's radio shows.

There is clearly some major envy / jealousy / butthurt going on with the Radio show. First they get Tricia to change it's name, and put a blurb at the front saying there is no affiliation with Websleuths, then they wage all out war on her, even contacting her regular guests! Was Kimster already upset before she left as co-host? I for one am glad she's no longer co-hosting .. that stupid horn blasting used to drive me nuts, but that's irrelevant. By memory didn't Tricia have the show before Kimster started co-hosting? Regardless Sue should have embraced the fact that Tricia did the radio show, it only promoted the forum and expanded the business. If they took issue with Tricia's opinions or topics then they really should have gone with the flow IMO, I don't agree with another single human on the planet all the time either, that doesn't mean I feel like I have the right to wage all out war on them.

Ugh again ..

Kimster's bitterness is clearly apparent from that affidavit, it answers a lot of the 'whys' if you ask me, but just makes her look bitter and resentful, I wonder if any of it is even relevant to the LS. Frankly most of it seemed like personal gripes again, and again, all the volunteers know where the door is, nobody forced them to hang around if they didn't like the lay of the land.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10